Yahoo Italia Ricerca nel Web

Risultati di ricerca

  1. Observations on the feeling of the beautiful and sublime. I. Kant, J. Goldthwait. Published 1961. Art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. View via Publisher. Save to Library. Create Alert. Cite.

  2. Abstract. Kant's only aesthetic work apart from the Critique of Judgment , Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime gives the reader a sense of the personality and character of its author as he sifts through the range of human responses to the concept of beauty and human manifestations of the beautiful and sublime.

  3. 5 lug 2011 · Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764), the lead text, was translated by Paul Guyer and appeared first in Anthropology, History, and Education (2007; paperback, 2011). Traditionally treated as a pre-critical work in Kantian aesthetics, Patrick Frierson rightly argues in his "Introduction" that this popular, short book is best read as one of Kant's proto-anthropological ...

  4. 30 set 2020 · Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 2020-09-30 03:02:27 Associated-names Goldthwait, John T Boxid

  5. 15 gen 2004 · His observations are the standard for the followers of sublimity and respect the earlier writing of Longinus. If this is your first Kant encounter you'll want to follow it up with his Critiques of Pure, Practical and Metaphysic Morals and Ethics. Kant can explain your inter most feeling and unlike his later Tutons doesn't blame mommy.

    • Immanuel Kant, John T. Goldthwait
  6. TRANSLATOR'S INTRODUCTION. Kant's little book Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime was submitted to the Dean of the University of Königsberg for approval of publication on October 8, 1763, and its first edition was published in Königsberg by Johann Jacob Kanter with the date of 1764.

  7. the Maladies of the Mind' and Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime," Hypatia 15:4 (Fall 2000) 82. See Ferdinand Alquie, Emmanuel Kant: Oeuvres philosophiques: Introduction aux oeuvres de 1764 a 1766 (Paris: Gallimard, 1980). 4Nevertheless, as Richard Velkey has argued and the Remarks bear out, this shift