Risultati di ricerca
Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, 1st Baronet, KCSI (3 March 1829 – 11 March 1894) was an English lawyer, judge, writer, and philosopher. One of the most famous critics of John Stuart Mill , Stephen achieved prominence as a philosopher, law reformer, and writer.
9 apr 2024 · Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, 1st Baronet (born March 3, 1829, London—died March 11, 1894, Ipswich, Suffolk, Eng.) was a British legal historian, Anglo-Indian administrator, judge, and author noted for his criminal-law reform proposals. His Indictable Offences Bill (late 1870s), though never enacted in Great Britain, has continued ...
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
LEMMI CORRELATI. STEPHEN, Sir James Fitzjames. Anna Maria Ratti. Giurista e politico inglese, nato a Londra il 5 marzo 1829, morto a Ipswich l'11 marzo 1894. Educato a Eton e a Cambridge, iniziò la professione forense nel 1854 e si dedicò contemporaneamente al giornalismo (nel 1865 fondò la Pall Mall Gazette ).
9 mag 2019 · In 1858 an aged and weakened James Stephen, the once-formidable “Over-Secretary of the Colonies” whose influence on the course of British imperial administration included such momentous tasks as drafting the bill to end slavery in the colonies and contributing to much of the administrative–constitutional groundwork for colonial ...
- Greg Conti
- 2021
Sir James Fitzjames Stephen (March 3, 1829 - March 11, 1894) was an English lawyer and judge, noted for his criminal law reform proposals. His General View of the Criminal Law of England (1863) was the first attempt since William Blackstone to explain the principles of English law and justice in a literary form.
Category. Political Science. James Fitzjames Stephen was an English Victorian lawyer, journalist and political philosopher who challenged John Stuart Mill’s conception of liberty in favor of a more.
This is an chapter on the thought of the Victorian-era judge, Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, about punishment of criminals. It discusses some of the themes in his major work, “The History of the Criminal Law of England.”. And it reflects on a cluster of questions involving criminal punishment: whether Stephen had a theory of punishment; if ...
