Risultati di ricerca
3,012 Followers, 497 Following, 133 Posts - See Instagram photos and videos from John Gettier (@john_gettier_official) Page couldn't load • Instagram Something went wrong
O problema de Gettier. John L. Pollock. É raro em filosofia chegar a consenso acerca de qualquer questão substantiva, mas durante algum tempo existiu um consenso quase completo sobre o que se designa “análise tradicional do conhecimento como crença verdadeira justificada”. De acordo com essa análise:
Infallibilism and Gettier's Legacy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. LXVI, No. 2, March 2003. Infallibilism and Gettier's Legacy. DANIEL AND FRANCES HOWARD-SNYDER. Western Washington University NEIL FEIT. SUNY, College at Fredonia. Infallibilism is the view that a belief cannot be at once warranted and false. In this essay.
The Gettier Problem is not the same as the value problem, but notice that the Gettier Problem is a kind of value problem. That is because a gettiered belief is one in which it is luck that the belief is true. Having a true belief is a good thing, but if we attain it by luck, it is not good enough for knowledge.
Assertion is fundamental to our lives as social and cognitive beings. By asserting we share knowledge, coordinate behavior, and advance collective inquiry. Accordingly, assertion is of considerable interest to cognitive scientists, social scientists, and philosophers. This paper advances our understanding of the norm of assertion.
23 set 2014 · Meta-philosophical research on the nature and evidential status of philosophical intuitions (cf. DePaul and Ramsey 1998; Sosa 2011) often treated the Gettier problem as a case study of intuition-based philosophical argument, such that the rejection of the tripartite theory of knowledge is understood as based on the “Gettier intuition” i.e ...
5 giorni fa · This problem, set out in Edmund Gettier's famous paper of 1963, has yet to be solved, and has challenged our best attempts to define what knowledge is. This volume offers an organised sequence of accessible and distinctive chapters explaining the history of debate surrounding Gettier's challenge, and where that debate should take us next.
