Yahoo Italia Ricerca nel Web

Risultati di ricerca

  1. In Gettier's Wake. John Turri. In Stephen Cade Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology: The Key Thinkers. New York: Continuum ( 2012 ) Copy BIBTEX.

  2. The expression ‘the Gettier problem’ refers to one or another problem exposed by Edmund Gettier when discussing the relation between several examples that he constructed and analyses of knowing advanced by various philosophers, including Plato in the Theatetus. Gettier’s examples appear to run counter to these ‘standard’ or ...

  3. 21 apr 2017 · In Chapter 1 we are introduced to what Hetherington calls “Gettierism”: “the thesis that Gettier was right in dismissing the justified-true-belief definition of knowledge” along with “a meta-epistemological element — the conviction that when we are pondering knowledge’s nature we are following an epistemologically fruitful lead only once we accept or at least presume Gettier’s ...

  4. phil159-2018-lec7-gettier. Phil. 159: Epistemology Sept. 27, 2018. Lecture 7: The Gettier Problem. I. The Justified-True-Belief Analysis of Knowledge. According to one attractive account, knowledge can be analyzed as follows: the JTB analysis of knowledge: Subject S knows proposition P if and only if: S believes P,

  5. We use cookies on this site, both our own and those belonging to third parties. They improve your browsing experience, analyse our services, and show you advertising related to your preferences, based on a profile drawn from your browsing habits (such as which pages you've visited).

  6. 10 apr 2014 · In Gettier’s paper, he provides two structurally similar examples of the latter sort—he gives two cases of apparent instances justified true belief that nonetheless don’t appear to be instances of knowledge. Let’s look at the more famous of the two. Smith and Jones have both applied for a job.

  7. 9 apr 2018 · In Gettier cases, the subject who has a justified belief is right, but not because any of their justifications were necessarily accurate. While there is a relationship between the subject’s justifications and the truth, it’s a somewhat incomplete or tenuous relationship.