Yahoo Italia Ricerca nel Web

Risultati di ricerca

  1. 6 mag 2024 · The state of nature was therefore a state of war, which could be ended only if individuals agreed (in a social contract) to give their liberty into the hands of a sovereign, on the sole condition that their lives were safeguarded by sovereign power.

  2. 17 mag 2024 · What Hobbes calls the “laws of nature,” the system of moral rules by which everyone is bound, cannot be safely complied with outside the state, for the total liberty that people have outside the state includes the liberty to flout the moral requirements if one’s survival seems to depend on it.

    • Tom Sorell
  3. 4 giorni fa · Jean–Jacques Rousseau was the maverick of the Enlightenment. Born a Protestant in Geneva in 1712 (d. 1778), he had to support himself as a music copyist. Unlike Voltaire and Montesquieu, both of whom came from rich families, Rousseau faced poverty nearly all his life. He wrote on an astounding variety of topics, including a best–selling ...

  4. 1 giorno fa · As with most Enlightenment views, the benefits of science were not seen universally: Rousseau criticized the sciences for distancing man from nature and not operating to make people happier. [36] Science during the Enlightenment was dominated by scientific societies and academies , which had largely replaced universities as centres ...

  5. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › John_LockeJohn Locke - Wikipedia

    4 giorni fa · In a natural state, all people were equal and independent, and everyone had a natural right to defend his "life, health, liberty, or possessions". [52] : 198 Most scholars trace the phrase " Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness " in the American Declaration of Independence to Locke's theory of rights, [53] although other origins have been suggested.

  6. 27 apr 2024 · This sounds a lot like what Rousseau has already described in his state of nature, namely individual actions which are harmful to society due to being motivated by personal interests. The primary difference is that in the state of nature, the rich, powerful, and cunning exploit the weak and unintelligent, whereas in civil society it ...