Risultati di ricerca
18 mag 2024 · Carl von Clausewitz (born June 1, 1780, Burg, near Magdeburg, Prussia [Germany]—died Nov. 16, 1831, Breslau, Silesia [now Wrocław, Pol.]) was a Prussian general and military thinker, whose work Vom Kriege (1832; On War) has become one of the most respected classics on military strategy.
- Azar Gat
7 mag 2024 · Claudio Visani. 7 Maggio 2024 - 16.35. Un famoso generale e teorico militare di ieri, il prussiano Carl Von Clausewitz, diceva che “la guerra è la continuazione della politica con altri...
3 mag 2024 · One of the most important thinkers of modern times is Carl von Clausewitz (1780–1831), who is sometimes also referred to as the “war philosopher”. According to von Clausewitz, the essence of war consists of three characteristics: first, hatred and enmity, second, the application of military force, and third, the political ...
- Peter Kestner
- peterkestner@gmx.de
6 giorni fa · Military strategist Carl von Clausewitz, lithograph by Franz Michelis after an oil painting by Wilhelm Wach, 1830. (more) The concept of blitzkrieg was formed by Prussian military tactics of the early 19th century, which recognized that victory could come only through forceful and swift action because of Prussia ’s relatively ...
4 giorni fa · In 1914, German strategic thinking derived from the writings of Carl von Clausewitz (1 June 1780 – 16 November 1831), Helmuth von Moltke the Elder (26 October 1800 – 24 April 1891) and Alfred von Schlieffen (28 February 1833 – 4 January 1913), who advocated maneuver, mass and envelopment to create the conditions for a decisive ...
6 giorni fa · While I was thinking about how to tackle this essay, I ran into the ghost of the great Prussian military thinker Carl von Clausewitz and, slightly against my expectations, he readily agreed to provide some opening thoughts. I made a note of our conversation afterwards, and it went roughly like this:
27 ott 2023 · The center of gravity (COG) is a crucial concept in both strategic studies and military planning, yet its ambiguous and incoherent nature has repeatedly led to abundant confusion. In particular, its relation to both Clausewitz and the German Schwerpunkt tradition remains poorly understood.
