Risultati di ricerca
Atest of some hypotheses generated by Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance, viz., that "if a person is induced to do or say something which is contrary to his private opinion, there will be a tendency for him to change his opinion so as to bring it into correspondence with what he has done or said. The larger the pressure used to elicit the overt behavior… the weaker will be the ...
- Leon Festinger, James M. Carlsmith
- 2011
COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF FORCED COMPLIANCE. LEON FESTINGER AND JAMES M. CARLSMITH1. Stanford. WHAT happens to a person's private opinion if he is forced to do or say something contrary to that opin-ion? Only recently has there been, any experi-mental work related to this question.
- 664KB
- 8
28 gen 2011 · Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The theory behind this experiment is that the person who is forced to improvise a speech convinces himself, and some evidence is presented, which is not altogether conclusive, in support of this explanation. Expand.
COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF FORCED COMPLIANCE . Leon Festinger & James M. Carlsmith[1] (1959) . First published in Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-‐210. What happens to a person's private opinion if he is forced to do or say something contrary to that opinion?
- 187KB
- 13
Forced compliance theory is the idea that authority or some other perceived higher-ranking person can force a lower-ranked individual to make statements or perform acts that violate their better judgment. It focuses on the goal of altering an individual's attitude through persuasion and authority.
Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. FESTINGER L , CARLSMITH JM. Journal of Abnormal Psychology , 01 Mar 1959, 58 (2): 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041593 PMID: 13640824. Share this article. Abstract. No abstract provided. Full text links. Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041593. Citations & impact.
forced compliance experiment. It was de-signed to assess the cognitive consequences of forced noncompliance under several degrees of incentive magnitude offered for induce-ment. We predicted that the greater the inducement the subjects resist by refusing to engage in attitude-discrepant behavior, the more extreme their original attitudes will ...
