Risultati di ricerca
Jared Warren, Philosopher. I'm a philosopher with broad interests, and an assistant professor at Stanford University. Books. (1) Shadows of Syntax: Revitalizing Logical and Mathematical Conventionalism (2020) Oxford. University Press. (2) The A Priori Without Magic (2022) Cambridge University Press. SOS notes. A Priori notes. Papers and Articles.
I'm a philosopher with wide-ranging interests. My first book develops and defends a conventionalist theory of logic and mathematics: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/shadows-of-syntax-9780190086152?q=Mathematical%20Logic&lang=en&cc=us. For more information on my work, see: www.jaredwarren.org. I'm a philosopher with wide-ranging interests.
Jared Warren, Stanford University, California. Publisher: Cambridge University Press. Online publication date: September 2022. Print publication year: 2022. Online ISBN: 9781009030472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030472. Subjects: Epistemology and Metaphysics , Philosophy. Series: Elements in Epistemology. Information. References. Metrics.
Revisiting Quine on truth by convention. J Warren. Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (2), 119-139. , 2017. 30. 2017. Quantifier variance and the collapse argument. J Warren. The Philosophical Quarterly 65 (259), 241-253.
Jared Warren. Jared Michael Warren [1] is an American musician who is the bassist of Big Business [2] (alongside drummer Coady Willis) and formerly the Melvins . Career. Both Warren and Willis joined the Melvins in January 2006 and appear on (A) Senile Animal as well as 2008's Nude with Boots and 2010's album The Bride Screamed Murder.
25 ott 2021 · Shadows of Syntax: Revitalizing Logical and Mathematical Conventionalism, by Jared Warren. Jared. Warren. . Oxford. : Oxford University Press. , 2020. Pp. xx. +. 385. . Fredrik Nyseth. Mind, Volume 132, Issue 527, July 2023, Pages 880–890, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzab054. Published: 25 October 2021. PDF. Split View. Cite. Permissions. Share.
Jared Warren. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (2):385-407 ( 2020 ) Copy BIBTEX. Abstract. Our relationship to the infinite is controversial. But it is widely agreed that our powers of reasoning are finite. I disagree with this consensus; I think that we can, and perhaps do, engage in infinite reasoning.
