Yahoo Italia Ricerca nel Web

Risultati di ricerca

  1. And if not, what are the consequences for justice as a moral and political ideal? These are the questions Michael Sandel takes up in this penetrating critique of contemporary liberalism. Sandel locates modern liberalism in the tradition of Kant, and focuses on its most influential recent expression in the work of John Rawls.

    • Michael J. Sandel
    • 1982
  2. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (1982; second edition 1998) is a book about liberalism by the philosopher Michael Sandel. The work helped start the liberalism-communitarianism debate that dominated Anglo-American political philosophy in the 1980s.

    • Michael J. Sandel
    • 231
    • 1982
    • 1982
  3. 18 mar 2021 · Internet Archive. Language. English. xvii, 231 pages ; 24 cm. Previous edition published in 1982. Includes bibliographical references and index. Introduction: Liberalism and the Primacy of Justice -- 1. Justice and the Moral Subject. The Primacy of Justice and the Priority of the Self.

  4. 16 ago 2016 · Liberalism and the Limits of Justice offers fresh and plausible readings of what politics is and might be.”. – Stephen Whitfield, Worldview. “Sandel [goes to] the heart of the epistemological confusions inherent in modern philosophical liberalism….

  5. And if not, what are the consequences for justice as a moral and political ideal? These are the questions Michael Sandel takes up in this penetrating critique of contemporary liberalism. Sandel locates modern liberalism in the tradition of Kant, and focuses on its most influential recent expression in the work of John Rawls.

  6. 28 mar 1998 · And if not, what are the consequences for justice as a moral and political ideal? These are the questions Michael Sandel takes up in this penetrating critique of contemporary liberalism. Sandel...

  7. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Michael J. Sandel. New York: Cambridge University Press ( 1982 ) Copy BIBTEX. Abstract. A liberal society seeks not to impose a single way of life, but to leave its citizens as free as possible to choose their own values and ends.