Risultati di ricerca
Richard M. Weaver. Richard Malcolm Weaver, Jr (March 3, 1910 – April 1, 1963) was an American scholar who taught English at the University of Chicago. He is primarily known as an intellectual historian, political philosopher, and a mid-20th century conservative and as an authority on modern rhetoric.
- J. Ryan Beiser, Richard M. Weaver
- 1968
Ideas Have Consequences is a philosophical work by Richard M. Weaver, published in 1948 by the University of Chicago Press. The book is largely a treatise on the harmful effects of nominalism on Western civilization since this doctrine gained prominence in the Late Middle Ages , followed by a prescription of a course of action ...
- Richard M. Weaver
- 190
- 1948
- 1948
Richard M. Weaver. American scholar who taught English at the University of Chicago. He is primarily known as a shaper of mid- 20th century conservatism and as an authority on modern rhetoric.
- (2K)
- April 1, 1963
- March 3, 1910
9 set 2017 · College English 7 (November 1945): 72-77. A Comprehensive Bibliography of Works by and about Richard M. Weaver 261. 'The South and the American Union." In The Lasting South. Ed. Louis D. Rubin, Jr. and James Jackson Kilpatrick. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1957: 46-68. (Reprinted in The Southern Essays of Richard M. Weaver.)
27 ott 2016 · ABSTRACT. Weaver's Ethics of Rhetoric, originally published in 1953, has been called his most important statement on the ethical and cultural role of rhetoric. A strong advocate of cultural conservatism, Weaver (1910-1953) argued strongly for the role of liberal studies in the face of what he saw as the encroachments of modern ...
- Richard M. Weaver
- New York
- 1953
4 nov 2013 · Books. Ideas Have Consequences. Richard M. Weaver. University of Chicago Press, Nov 4, 2013 - Philosophy - 202 pages. A foundational text of the modern conservative movement, this 1948...
17 dic 2014 · Read a classic essay by the conservative scholar and rhetorician Richard M. Weaver, who argues for the importance of liberal education in developing the mind and character of free men. He criticizes the progressive movement that denies the nature and purpose of education and threatens its independence and truth.
